By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

As we’ve stated many times, the primary objective in managing a pension plan is to SECURE the promised benefits at a reasonable COST and with prudent RISK. For most of Pension America, the primary objective has morphed into a return objective and the asset allocation has migrated toward a much more aggressive risk profile. One in which alternative investments (real estate, private equity, and private debt) have been emphasized. One can argue about the value add that has been achieved, but you would be hard-pressed to argue that the cost structures of these plans hasn’t risen dramatically.

I saw this little blurb in a Bloomberg email this morning and it immediately grabbed my attention. “New York City’s pensions paid Wall Street money managers about $1.7 billion in fees last year, a roughly $150 million increase from the prior year. Fees paid by the city’s five pensions rose 10%, faster than the growth rate of assets, according to the city’s annual comprehensive financial report.” The combined assets of the City’s pension systems are $253 billion and the $1.7 billion in fees is equal to 67 bps annually. Wow!

It was reported in the CAFR > 70% of the 321 investment managers were alternative managers. That is fine if plans are actually being rewarded for the lack of liquidity, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. Sure, the nearly 8% fiscal year return eclipsed the annual return objective of 7%, but it fell nearly 4% below a 65% equity/35% fixed income benchmark, as reported by the City. Worse, and I repeat, fees grew by $150 million in the last fiscal year or about 10% more than in fiscal year 2022 despite assets not growing by a similar level.

Given NYC’s combined funded ratio of about 83%, they would be wise to take risk off the table by bifurcating the assets into liquidity and growth buckets. They would quickly realize a substantial savings in fees, as a cash flow matching strategy can accomplish the objective of securing benefits at both a reasonable cost (<15bps) and also at a prudent level of risk. They might also find that the present value cost of the future value benefits will provide substantial savings and a likely surplus. What a deal!

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

The FOMC has paused additional increases since July, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they have been victorious in their quest to defeat inflation. If 2% is the Fed’s line in the sand, they still have quite a bit to accomplish. There has certainly been progress made since last summer, but not enough at this time to feel confident that future increases in the FOMC’s FFR aren’t necessary. Recent economic data belie the broad expectations of a US recession. Furthermore, the Fed’s “preferred” measure of inflation, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index, which strips out the volatile food and energy components, rose 0.3% in September, according to a new Bureau of Economic Analysis report. Please note that the Food & Energy components rose by 6.7% annualized in September.

As of the writing of this post, each of the key rates on the Treasury yield curve are up, with the 10-year Treasury note yield up just over 5 bps to 4.89%. As we wrote last week, 5% Treasury yields are meaningful. As investment-grade corporate bond yields eclipse 6%, bonds become a significant alternative to equities in asset allocation strategies, especially for pension plan sponsors looking to SECURE the promised benefits through a cash flow matching (CFM) strategy.

None of us know where US interest rates and inflation will be in 6-12 months. Why assume the investment risks of a traditional asset allocation in which all of a plan’s assets are focused on the return on asset (ROA) objective. Bifurcate the plan’s assets into liquidity and growth (Alpha) buckets. Use CFM to ensure that the promises have been secured and the liquidity is available to meet those monthly needs. Doing so “buys time” for the Alpha assets to grow unencumbered. As you know, time is your friend, at least in an investing sense, and the more time that we give to an investment strategy the greater the probability of success.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

This week brings us Halloween and the markets may provide both “tricks and treats”, but the PBGC continues to hand out treats in the form of SFA grants to multiemployer plans. There wasn’t a lot of activity last week, but any action is good for the plan participants who continue to hope for a secure retirement.

According to the latest update by the PBGC, there was one plan, Local 210’s Pension Plan, a priority Group 5 member, received approval for its revised SFA application. Local 210 will receive $49.3 million for the plan’s 3,887 participants. In other news, United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Pension Plan’s application is now under review. This plan is seeking more than $74 million for its 15,420 participants. While the UFCW application proceeds through the review process, two other funds have withdrawn applications, including the Southwestern Pennsylvania and Western Maryland Area Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund and the Pacific Coast Shipyards Pension Plan. Southwestern’s application had already been revised. Perhaps three times will prove to be the charm.

There was a presentation delivered at the recently concluded IFEBP annual conference in Boston that addressed LDI broadly. At the end of the presentation there were a series of questions listed that went unanswered. Here is one of those: Can this concept (LDI) be applied to SFA assets? If the presenter was referring to cash flow matching as the LDI strategy then the answer is unequivocally, YES! In fact, it should be the only strategy considered for the SFA bucket, as it is a sinking fund designed to fund benefits and expenses chronologically as far into the future as the SFA will go. Please DON’T assume unnecessary market risk by investing in equity or return-seeking fixed income strategies, as the potential “reward” is minimal versus the pain of not being able to secure benefits for as long as possible.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

From basically the time that I entered our industry (October 13, 1981) to the end of 2021, US interest rates were on a decline. Sure, there were modest periods in which the Fed tightened, such as 1994, but for the most part the investment community enjoyed the benefits of falling rates and low inflation for nearly four decades. The returns associated with investing in bonds from that period forward were quite beneficial for pension plans. How times have changed!

Since the Federal Reserve began raising rates on March 17, 2022, the aggregate index has witnessed its worst calendar year return ever at -13.0% in 2022 and it is on the verge of producing the second worst calendar year performance in 2023. Prior to this interest rate move, the worst return experienced on a calendar year basis had been 1994’s -2.9%. Again, how times have changed. As the table below highlights, one would have to go back 35 years from yesterday (October 1988) to have gotten a 5+% annualized return for any period of length.

That said, today’s rate environment is presenting plan sponsors with a terrific entry point, as most yields are close to the 5% level and investment grade corporate yields are close to 6% or more at this time. As a reminder, a bond purchased at par and allowed to mature will generate a return equal to the bond’s yield. Buying a bond in this environment will provide plan sponsors with the opportunity to capture a significant percentage of the target ROA without an abundance of risk.

At Ryan ALM, Inc. we would suggest that bonds should not be looked at as return-seeking instruments. They have known cash flows of interest and principal and those can be used to defease a pension plan’s liability cash flows with certainty. The current interest rate environment is providing pension plan sponsors and their advisors with a wonderful opportunity to SECURE the promised benefits at significantly reduced cost. As we highlighted in the recent blog post “Just the Facts”, it is not unheard of to reduce the present value cost of those future value benefits by 50% or more depending on how far into the future that the cash flow matching program covers.

The current level of rates may not rival the double-digit rates available in 1981, but they are certainly quite attractive relative to the Covid-19 induced historically low levels. Use the current rate environment to secure the promises made to your participants and bring certainty to a very uncertain investing environment.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

Sgt. Joe Friday, Dragnet, is credited with saying, “Just the facts, Ma’am”, but he actually never uttered the phrase. However, that wording did appear in the movie starring Tom Hanks and Dan Aykroyd (1987). Why mention this? Well, investment management firms may be better at marketing/sales than they are at actually managing investment products. Spin wins! However, in this challenging investment environment, getting “just the facts” is incredibly important.

I’ve produced more than 1,300 blog posts and many, if not most, are focused on how plan sponsors and their advisors can secure the pension promise, reduce funding cost, while maintaining prudent levels of risk. Does this seem too good to be true? It’s not, especially today with US interest rates at nearly a two decade high. Securing the promises at a reasonable cost and with prudent risk is very achievable. Here are the facts based on a recent analysis that we completed for a large public pension system.

Their defined benefit fund has roughly $2.1 billion in AUM. The total estimated liabilities going out beyond 2100 have a future value (FV) of $8.8 billion, while the Retired Lives Liability (RLL) carries a FV of $3.7 billion.

As the table below highlights, we can defease all of the RLL at a present value (PV) cost of $972 million. This equates to a cost reduction of 73.6% or $2.7 billion. Yes, some will say that the “savings” are nothing more than the time value of money. However, when one defeases pension liabilities, the “savings” are realized immediately and generated with little risk through an investment grade bond portfolio, unlike a traditional asset allocation and the volatility associated with that process. Furthermore, we can tell you what the return will be on the portfolio on day 1! Is there any other strategy that can do that?

If securing all of the RLL is not a desired goal at this time, we can defease any series of years that you desire. Again, in the table below, we have defeased liabilities for 10- and 30-years. The cost savings reduction is quite meaningful. The cost savings will always be more robust the longer the maturity of the program. Bond math is very straightforward: the longer the maturity and higher the yield, the lower the cost.

As a plan sponsor, why wouldn’t you want to SECURE the promises made to your participants? Why wouldn’t you want to reduce funding costs significantly? Why would you want to continue investing in the capital markets with all of the uncertainty that brings? How comforting it would be for all involved in the process to know that the RLL has been fully defeased. The yields highlighted above are robust. Take advantage of those. Don’t let this opportunity pass as we’ve done on multiple occasions before.

I’ve presented the facts. We’d be happy to generate a similar analysis for you at no cost to complete the review. Call us.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

P&I recently interviewed Ronald Peyton, Executive Chairman, on his nearly 50 years at Callan, where he also served as CEO from 1990-2017. First, congratulations, Ron, on an impressive career. Your influence within the retirement industry will be felt forever. Second, thank you for sharing your thoughts with us through the P&I interview. It was refreshing to read many of your comments. Here is one exchange that had me applauding:

Q: Have clients changed much over the years in terms of what they are seeking?

A: Clients have always focused on generating maximized returns at an acceptable level of risk. Our job is to keep them focused on a longer-term perspective of achieving the returns they need with the least risk and to avoid focusing on short-term gains. We consistently advise clients that one of the most important elements of investing is minimizing risk in achieving the returns needed to fund their objectives, not always seeking the highest returns. When all you do is chase returns, you expose yourself to almost unlimited risks.

Yes, yes, and YES!

Our industry has migrated through the years from focusing on the promise and managing to that promise to trying to generate the greatest return. All we’ve done in the process is guarantee volatility in the funded status and contribution expenses and not success. Isn’t it time to get off the asset allocation rollercoaster? Isn’t it time to bring certainty to a very uncertain process due to the focus on return? The US interest rate environment is providing a wonderful opportunity through a cash flow matching (CFM) strategy to do what Mr. Peyton has suggested: Achieve the returns necessary to fund their objective, while not seeking the highest return! We couldn’t agree more.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

It is the week before Halloween, but things are already scary for the US capital markets, as rising US interest rates continue to create uncertainty for bonds, equities, real estate (particularly housing), and other investments. Fortunately, the implementation of the ARPA legislation continues unabated as the PBGC allowed for the submission of five more applications for Special Financial Assistance (SFA). Each of those applications came from the waiting list and included, CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan, Local 1034 Pension Plan, Kansas Construction Trades Open End Pension Trust Fund, Local 945 I.B. of T. Pension Plan, and the Radio, Television and Recording Arts Pension Plan. These pension funds are collectively seeking $710 million for just over 37,000 plan participants. Presently, there are 27 applications under review by the PBGC.

In other news during the prior week, there were no applications approved or denied. Furthermore, there were no new additions to the waiting list. There were, however, 3 funds that withdrew the SFA applications, including, CWA/ITU Negotiated Pension Plan, UFCW – Northern California Employers Joint Pension Plan, and the Retail Food Employers and United Food and Commercial Workers Local 711 Pension Plan. In total, they are seeking $2.9 billion for roughly 188,000 participants. The largest of these by far is the UFCW plan of Northern California (seeking $2.3 B in SFA).

It is easy to get lost in the large $s associated with this legislation, but it is critically important to remember that 1,396,465 plan participants are in these pension plans that have either received the SFA (959,286) or are in the review queue, with many, many more to come. This legislation is truly life-saving in many cases. Please refer back to previous blog posts that highlighted Carol’s plight.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

We’ve had a very exciting week in the US capital markets as a number of Fed officials, including Fed Chair Powell, had the opportunity to update us on the current inflationary environment and the outlook for US interest rates. US interest rates and equities have been bouncing around with each utterance. However, many market participants interpreted Powell’s comments that the Fed has accomplished its objective, as recent “core” inflation has moderated. But did he really close the door on a future further increase in rates?

Here’s what Powell shared, “Additional evidence of persistently above-trend growth, or that tightness in the labor market is no longer easing, could put further progress on inflation at risk and could warrant further tightening of monetary policy”. In my opinion, the door remains open and more than ajar. What does above-trend growth mean? Does the current forecast by the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow model of 5.4% annualized real growth for Q3’23 warrant the label of above growth? It certainly seems so to me.

Furthermore, the job market continues to surprise. Near historic low unemployment levels persist and initial jobless claims seem to come in below forecast each and every week. The most recent data release revealed the lowest level (198K) in more than nine months. As we’ve mentioned in numerous blog posts, oil may prove to be the fly in the chardonnay, as the price of WTI has crept above $90/barrel once more. Oil and its byproducts are in more than 6,000 products.

Despite these facts, US Treasury bonds across the yield curve have rallied this morning, bringing the yields for 3- to 10-year Treasury Note maturities below or further away from the 5% level, while equities are once again down anywhere from 0.5% (DJIA) to 1.5% (NASDAQ). Clearly, there remains great uncertainty as to how the US economy will react to the Fed’s aggressive tightening first enacted in March 2022. Given this uncertainty, plan sponsors and their advisors should seek greater certainty through an investment in cash flow matching, which carefully matches asset cash flows to benefits and expenses. The elevated US interest rates are providing plan sponsors with a wonderful opportunity to significantly reduce risk while not sacrificing return, although managing a pension is truly not a return game.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

The Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2023 report has been released. The United States was given a score of 63, which placed our retirement readiness at 22 of 47 countries that were evaluated. According to the Mercer CFA study, a 63 places us at roughly the average score (62.9) among those ranked and we were given a letter grade of C+. I don’t know about you but if I had scored a 63 (scale of 0-100) during my school days, my letter grade would have likely been an F. Based on how I feel that we are prepared as a nation, I think that an F is much more appropriate than a C+. What about you?

According to the survey, “the overall index value is based on three weighted sub-indices—adequacy (40%), sustainability (35%) and integrity (25%)—to measure each retirement income system. Adequacy looked at areas such as benefits, system design, savings and government support. Sustainability examined pension coverage, total assets, demography and other areas. Integrity encompassed regulation, governance and protection.”

The U.S. retirement system scored 66.7 on adequacy, 61.1 on sustainability and 59.5 on integrity, with Integrity being the poorest ranking as it trailed the worldwide average score by >12 points. Our retirement system was evaluated based on the Social Security system and voluntary private pensions, which may be job-related (DB or DC) or personal, such as an IRA. Other systems with comparable overall index values to the U.S. included Colombia (61.9), the United Arab Emirates (62.5) and Hong Kong (64.0). I don’t know about you, but being ranked among those countries doesn’t make me feel good about our effort or achievement. Systems scoring the highest were the Netherlands (85), Iceland (83.5), Denmark (81.3), and Israel (80.8) – they were given an ‘A’ grade.

We know that we can do better. The loss of DB pension plans within the private sector is a very harmful trend. Leakage within DC plans makes them more like glorified savings accounts rather than retirement vehicles, and Social Security provides small relief for a majority of recipients. Asking untrained individuals to fund, manage, and then disburse a “retirement benefit” without the financial means, investment skill, and crystal ball to forecast longevity is silly.

Mercer and the CFA institute recommended a series of potential reforms to improve the long-term success of the US retirement system. I just loved this one:

“Promoting higher labor force participation at older ages, which will increase the savings available for retirement and limit the continuing increase in the length of retirement;“

A truly amazing suggestion – if you never retire then you don’t have to worry about whether or not your system will provide an adequate benefit! Problem solved! Many Americans would welcome the opportunity to extend their careers/employment opportunities, but some jobs require physical labor not easily done at more mature ages, while many American companies are anxious to rid themselves of higher priced and experienced talent in favor of younger workers (ageism).

We can pray that the higher US interest rate environment will begin to improve outcomes for our workers whether their plans are a defined benefit or defined contribution offering.

By: Russ Kamp, Managing Director, Ryan ALM, Inc.

We hope that you had a great weekend. It is easy at this time of year to get distracted with college and pro football, baseball playoffs, the start of hockey season, and the turning of the leaves in the Northeast, not to mention the incessant rain that has been falling in New Jersey. I don’t know if any of these events/activities impacted the activity level at the PBGC, as they implement the ARPA legislation, but something must have slowed their progress.

According to the PBGC’s latest update (October 13th), there were no new applications filed, approved, denied, or withdrawn. This includes the 25 applications that were previously submitted and the 92 applications that remain on the waiting list (see below). Overseeing ARPA’s implementation has been a monumental task for the PBGC. I suspect that there is always a ton of work going on behind the scenes, but the visible output from that activity has slowed recently.

Only one plan of the 65 that have received approval for its SFA grant has yet to receive the money. Paper Handlers’ – Publishers’ Pension Plan received approval on September 21, 2023 for an award of $20.6 million that will support the 244 plan participants. With elevated interest rates currently available to plan sponsors, the investment of the SFA proceeds into a cash flow matching (CFM) strategy has never been more timely. Why take equity risk given the uncertainty of the economy? In addition, return-seeking fixed income products will potentially experience the third consecutive year of negative returns, as rising rates impact a bond’s principal. With a CFM strategy, the careful matching of bond cash flows of income and principal with the plan’s liability cash flows (benefits and expenses) eliminates interest rate risk, as benefits are future values that are not interest rate sensitive. Any questions? Contact us (ryanalm.com), as we are always available to help.